+2004-05-08 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+
+ * frame.c (get_prev_frame_1): Work around GCC bug.
+ * frame.h: Add comment about GCC bug.
+
2004-05-07 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* observer.c: Include "commands.h" and "gdbcmd.h".
get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame)
{
struct frame_info *prev_frame;
+ struct frame_id this_id;
gdb_assert (this_frame != NULL);
/* Check that this frame's ID was valid. If it wasn't, don't try to
unwind to the prev frame. Be careful to not apply this test to
the sentinel frame. */
- if (this_frame->level >= 0 && !frame_id_p (get_frame_id (this_frame)))
+ this_id = get_frame_id (this_frame);
+ if (this_frame->level >= 0 && !frame_id_p (this_id))
{
if (frame_debug)
{
go backwards) and sentinel frames (the test is meaningless). */
if (this_frame->next->level >= 0
&& this_frame->next->type != SIGTRAMP_FRAME
- && frame_id_inner (get_frame_id (this_frame),
- get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
+ && frame_id_inner (this_id, get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
error ("Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)");
/* Check that this and the next frame are not identical. If they
are, there is most likely a stack cycle. As with the inner-than
test above, avoid comparing the inner-most and sentinel frames. */
if (this_frame->level > 0
- && frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (this_frame),
- get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
+ && frame_id_eq (this_id, get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
error ("Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)");
/* Allocate the new frame but do not wire it in to the frame chain.
/* Return the per-frame unique identifer. Can be used to relocate a
frame after a frame cache flush (and other similar operations). If
- FI is NULL, return the null_frame_id. */
+ FI is NULL, return the null_frame_id.
+
+ NOTE: kettenis/20040508: These functions return a structure. On
+ platforms where structures are returned in static storage (vax,
+ m68k), this may trigger compiler bugs in code like:
+
+ if (frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (l), get_frame_id (r)))
+
+ where the return value from the first get_frame_id (l) gets
+ overwritten by the second get_frame_id (r). Please avoid writing
+ code like this. Use code like:
+
+ struct frame_id id = get_frame_id (l);
+ if (frame_id_eq (id, get_frame_id (r)))
+
+ instead, since that avoids the bug. */
extern struct frame_id get_frame_id (struct frame_info *fi);
extern struct frame_id frame_unwind_id (struct frame_info *next_frame);