btrfs: add KCSAN annotations for unlocked access to block_rsv->full
authorDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Mon, 5 Sep 2022 16:32:23 +0000 (18:32 +0200)
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:28:02 +0000 (12:28 +0200)
KCSAN reports that there's unlocked access mixed with locked access,
which is technically correct but is not a bug.  To avoid false alerts at
least from KCSAN, add annotation and use a wrapper whenever ->full is
accessed for read outside of lock.

It is used as a fast check and only advisory.  In the worst case the
block reserve is found !full and becomes full in the meantime, but
properly handled.

Depending on the value of ->full, btrfs_block_rsv_release decides
where to return the reservation, and block_rsv_release_bytes handles a
NULL pointer for block_rsv and if it's not NULL then it double checks
the full status under a lock.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAAwBoOJDjei5Hnem155N_cJwiEkVwJYvgN-tQrwWbZQGhFU=cA@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/YvHU/vsXd7uz5V6j@hungrycats.org
Reported-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs/btrfs/block-rsv.c
fs/btrfs/block-rsv.h
fs/btrfs/transaction.c

index 6ce704d..ec96285 100644 (file)
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ u64 btrfs_block_rsv_release(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
         */
        if (block_rsv == delayed_rsv)
                target = global_rsv;
-       else if (block_rsv != global_rsv && !delayed_rsv->full)
+       else if (block_rsv != global_rsv && !btrfs_block_rsv_full(delayed_rsv))
                target = delayed_rsv;
 
        if (target && block_rsv->space_info != target->space_info)
index 0c18370..578c349 100644 (file)
@@ -92,4 +92,13 @@ static inline void btrfs_unuse_block_rsv(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
        btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, block_rsv, 0, NULL);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Fast path to check if the reserve is full, may be carefully used outside of
+ * locks.
+ */
+static inline bool btrfs_block_rsv_full(const struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv)
+{
+       return data_race(rsv->full);
+}
+
 #endif /* BTRFS_BLOCK_RSV_H */
index d9e6089..9d7563d 100644 (file)
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int num_items,
                 */
                num_bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, num_items);
                if (flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL &&
-                   delayed_refs_rsv->full == 0) {
+                   btrfs_block_rsv_full(delayed_refs_rsv) == 0) {
                        delayed_refs_bytes = num_bytes;
                        num_bytes <<= 1;
                }
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int num_items,
                if (rsv->space_info->force_alloc)
                        do_chunk_alloc = true;
        } else if (num_items == 0 && flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL &&
-                  !delayed_refs_rsv->full) {
+                  !btrfs_block_rsv_full(delayed_refs_rsv)) {
                /*
                 * Some people call with btrfs_start_transaction(root, 0)
                 * because they can be throttled, but have some other mechanism