Revert "[DAG] Elide overlapping stores"

This reverts commit r322085. Internal PPC testing is still showing the
same symptoms as when this patch landed the last time.

llvm-svn: 322474

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index 093a200..91f6ba4 100644 (file)
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -13819,29 +13819,30 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSTORE(SDNode *N) {
     }
   }
 
-  // Deal with elidable overlapping chained stores.
-  if (StoreSDNode *ST1 = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(Chain))
-    if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None && ST->isUnindexed() &&
-        ST1->isUnindexed() && !ST1->isVolatile() && ST1->hasOneUse() &&
-        !ST1->getBasePtr().isUndef() && !ST->isVolatile()) {
-      BaseIndexOffset STBasePtr = BaseIndexOffset::match(ST, DAG);
-      BaseIndexOffset ST1BasePtr = BaseIndexOffset::match(ST1, DAG);
-      unsigned STBytes = ST->getMemoryVT().getStoreSize();
-      unsigned ST1Bytes = ST1->getMemoryVT().getStoreSize();
-      int64_t PtrDiff;
-      // If this is a store who's preceeding store to a subset of the same
-      // memory and no one other node is chained to that store we can
-      // effectively drop the store. Do not remove stores to undef as they may
-      // be used as data sinks.
-
-      if (((ST->getBasePtr() == ST1->getBasePtr()) &&
-           (ST->getValue() == ST1->getValue())) ||
-          (STBasePtr.equalBaseIndex(ST1BasePtr, DAG, PtrDiff) &&
-           (0 <= PtrDiff) && (PtrDiff + ST1Bytes <= STBytes))) {
+  if (StoreSDNode *ST1 = dyn_cast<StoreSDNode>(Chain)) {
+    if (ST->isUnindexed() && !ST->isVolatile() && ST1->isUnindexed() &&
+        !ST1->isVolatile() && ST1->getBasePtr() == Ptr &&
+        ST->getMemoryVT() == ST1->getMemoryVT()) {
+      // If this is a store followed by a store with the same value to the same
+      // location, then the store is dead/noop.
+      if (ST1->getValue() == Value) {
+        // The store is dead, remove it.
+        return Chain;
+      }
+
+      // If this is a store who's preceeding store to the same location
+      // and no one other node is chained to that store we can effectively
+      // drop the store. Do not remove stores to undef as they may be used as
+      // data sinks.
+      if (OptLevel != CodeGenOpt::None && ST1->hasOneUse() &&
+          !ST1->getBasePtr().isUndef()) {
+        // ST1 is fully overwritten and can be elided. Combine with it's chain
+        // value.
         CombineTo(ST1, ST1->getChain());
-        return SDValue(N, 0);
+        return SDValue();
       }
     }
+  }
 
   // If this is an FP_ROUND or TRUNC followed by a store, fold this into a
   // truncating store.  We can do this even if this is already a truncstore.

diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/ldst-paired-aliasing.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/ldst-paired-aliasing.ll
index 9b0b51d..9c698b5 100644 (file)
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/ldst-paired-aliasing.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/ldst-paired-aliasing.ll
@@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ declare void @llvm.memset.p0i8.i64(i8* nocapture, i8, i64, i32, i1) #3
 define i32 @main() local_unnamed_addr #1 {
 ; Make sure the stores happen in the correct order (the exact instructions could change).
 ; CHECK-LABEL: main:
-; CHECK: str xzr, [sp, #80]
+; CHECK: stp xzr, xzr, [sp, #72]
 ; CHECK: str w9, [sp, #80]
-; CHECK: stp q0, q0, [sp, #48]
+; CHECK: str q0, [sp, #48]
 ; CHECK: ldr w8, [sp, #48]
+; CHECK: str q0, [sp, #64]
 
 for.body.lr.ph.i.i.i.i.i.i63:
   %b1 = alloca [10 x i32], align 16