gpu: drm: bridge: No need to set device_driver owner

There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
module_platform_driver() helper function.

Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch as:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c:1957:6-11: No need to set .owner here.
The core will do it.

No functional changes are intended.

Signed-off-by: Anup Sharma <anupnewsmail@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZF9igb/nvL6GRBsq@yoga

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
index e0a402a..10dc331 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
@@ -1954,7 +1954,6 @@ static struct platform_driver samsung_dsim_driver = {
        .remove = samsung_dsim_remove,
        .driver = {
                   .name = "samsung-dsim",
-                  .owner = THIS_MODULE,
                   .pm = &samsung_dsim_pm_ops,
                   .of_match_table = samsung_dsim_of_match,
        },