if (em->generation < newer_than)
goto next;
+ /* This em is under writeback, no need to defrag */
+ if (em->generation == (u64)-1)
+ goto next;
+
/*
* Our start offset might be in the middle of an existing extent
* map, so take that into account.
ret = 0;
break;
}
+ cond_resched();
}
if (ra_allocated)
lock_page(page);
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
unlock_page(page);
+ btrfs_err(fs_info,
+ "send: IO error at offset %llu for inode %llu root %llu",
+ page_offset(page), sctx->cur_ino,
+ sctx->send_root->root_key.objectid);
put_page(page);
ret = -EIO;
break;
static inline int btrfs_start_delalloc_flush(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
/*
- * We use writeback_inodes_sb here because if we used
+ * We use try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() here because if we used
* btrfs_start_delalloc_roots we would deadlock with fs freeze.
* Currently are holding the fs freeze lock, if we do an async flush
* we'll do btrfs_join_transaction() and deadlock because we need to
* wait for the fs freeze lock. Using the direct flushing we benefit
* from already being in a transaction and our join_transaction doesn't
* have to re-take the fs freeze lock.
+ *
+ * Note that try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() will only trigger writeback
+ * if it can read lock sb->s_umount. It will always be able to lock it,
+ * except when the filesystem is being unmounted or being frozen, but in
+ * those cases sync_filesystem() is called, which results in calling
+ * writeback_inodes_sb() while holding a write lock on sb->s_umount.
+ * Note that we don't call writeback_inodes_sb() directly, because it
+ * will emit a warning if sb->s_umount is not locked.
*/
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, FLUSHONCOMMIT))
- writeback_inodes_sb(fs_info->sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
+ try_to_writeback_inodes_sb(fs_info->sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
return 0;
}