ASoC: soc-dapm.c: add comment for kzalloc()/kfree() on snd_soc_dai_link_event_pre_pmu()
authorKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Thu, 8 Sep 2022 02:45:12 +0000 (02:45 +0000)
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Thu, 8 Sep 2022 10:39:39 +0000 (11:39 +0100)
snd_soc_dai_link_event_pre_pmu() is using kzalloc()/kfree() for params.
It looks we don't need to use these, but are necessary.
But, it is difficult to know why it is necessary without any comments.
This patch adds the reasons via comment.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yxc2wzbZsSVZNf8Y@sirena.org.uk/
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878rmubn47.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c

index 76615d59e2b67de072f40493e0615fb5a8d07580..fc2f75ed190d5fcc1bc5fc4b3e6fafda2dc649f9 100644 (file)
@@ -3842,6 +3842,15 @@ snd_soc_dai_link_event_pre_pmu(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
        unsigned int fmt;
        int ret = 0;
 
+       /*
+        * NOTE
+        *
+        * snd_pcm_hw_params is quite large (608 bytes on arm64) and is
+        * starting to get a bit excessive for allocation on the stack,
+        * especially when you're building with some of the KASAN type
+        * stuff that increases stack usage.
+        * So, we use kzalloc()/kfree() for params in this function.
+        */
        params = kzalloc(sizeof(*params), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!params)
                return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3939,7 +3948,9 @@ snd_soc_dai_link_event_pre_pmu(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
        runtime->rate = params_rate(params);
 
 out:
+       /* see above NOTE */
        kfree(params);
+
        return ret;
 }