Fix patterns in lim and dceloop testcases.
authorSebastian Pop <sebastian.pop@amd.com>
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:50:11 +0000 (02:50 +0000)
committerSebastian Pop <spop@gcc.gnu.org>
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:50:11 +0000 (02:50 +0000)
2009-07-30  Sebastian Pop  <sebastian.pop@amd.com>

* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20050314-1.c: Fix patterns for lim and dceloop.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-32.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-33.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-34.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-35.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-7.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23109.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-2.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-3.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-1.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-2.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-3.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-6.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/structopt-1.c: Same.
* gcc.dg/vect/dump-tree-dceloop-pr26359.c: Same.
* gfortran.dg/pr32921.f: Same.

From-SVN: r150304

17 files changed:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20050314-1.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-32.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-33.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-34.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-35.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-7.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23109.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-2.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-3.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-1.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-2.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-3.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-6.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/structopt-1.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/dump-tree-dceloop-pr26359.c
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr32921.f

index 22f81a5..2704153 100644 (file)
@@ -1,5 +1,24 @@
 2009-07-30  Sebastian Pop  <sebastian.pop@amd.com>
 
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20050314-1.c: Fix patterns for lim and dceloop.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-32.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-33.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-34.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-35.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-7.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23109.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-2.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/restrict-3.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-1.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-2.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-3.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-6.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/structopt-1.c: Same.
+       * gcc.dg/vect/dump-tree-dceloop-pr26359.c: Same.
+       * gfortran.dg/pr32921.f: Same.
+
+2009-07-30  Sebastian Pop  <sebastian.pop@amd.com>
+
        * gcc.dg/graphite/graphite_autopar/force-parallel-1.c: New.
        * gcc.dg/graphite/graphite_autopar/force-parallel-2.c: New.
        * gcc.dg/graphite/graphite_autopar/force-parallel-3.c: New.
index 04f2028..2ba1ee0 100644 (file)
@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ void xxx (void)
 /* Store motion may be applied to the assignment to a[k], since sinf
    cannot read nor write the memory.  */
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Moving statement" 1 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Moving statement" 1 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 945ee2f..3a92a08 100644 (file)
@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ void test3(struct a *A)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 3 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 3 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 6b9b67f..3ee4e3c 100644 (file)
@@ -36,5 +36,5 @@ void test5(struct a *A, unsigned b)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 4 "lim" { xfail lp64 } } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 4 "lim1" { xfail lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 4a0d1ea..5da804f 100644 (file)
@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ void f (int n)
 }
 
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of r" 6 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of r" 6 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index e1bdde2..4716e96 100644 (file)
@@ -60,6 +60,6 @@ void test4(struct a *A, unsigned long b)
     }
 }
 /* long index not hoisted for avr target PR 36561 */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 8 "lim" { xfail { "avr-*-*" } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 6 "lim" { target { "avr-*-*" } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 8 "lim1" { xfail { "avr-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of" 6 "lim1" { target { "avr-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index a4597b1..e9e8d7d 100644 (file)
@@ -31,5 +31,5 @@ int xxx (void)
    Calls to cst_fun2 and pure_fun2 should not be, since calling
    with k = 0 may be invalid.  */
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Moving statement" 3 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Moving statement" 3 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index e60b2f0..39add72 100644 (file)
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ int main()
 /* LIM only performs the transformation in the no-trapping-math case.  In
    the future we will do it for trapping-math as well in recip, check that
    this is not wrongly optimized.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "reciptmp" "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "reciptmp" "lim1" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "reciptmp" "recip" } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "recip" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
 
index b76ad98..ec82465 100644 (file)
@@ -10,5 +10,5 @@ void foo (float * __restrict__ a, float * __restrict__ b, int n, int j)
 
 /* We should move the RHS of the store out of the loop.  */
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Moving statement" 11 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Moving statement" 11 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 08faafa..90f62aa 100644 (file)
@@ -14,5 +14,5 @@ void f(int * __restrict__ r,
 
 /* We should apply store motion to the store to *r.  */
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing store motion of \\\*r" "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing store motion of \\\*r" "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index db36ff0..aa40d44 100644 (file)
@@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ quantum_toffoli (int control1, int control2, int target,
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "1 <<" 3 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "1 <<" 3 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 7b18b1c..9274261 100644 (file)
@@ -18,5 +18,5 @@ int size)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "1 <<" 3 "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "1 <<" 3 "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 9195601..8580058 100644 (file)
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ void foo(int n)
     global.y += global.x*global.x;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing store motion of global.y" "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Moving statement.*global.x.*out of loop 1" "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing store motion of global.y" "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Moving statement.*global.x.*out of loop 1" "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index 0da57aa..e29f50c 100644 (file)
@@ -10,5 +10,5 @@ void foo(void)
       y[j] = y[j] + a[i][j] * x[i];
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing store motion of y" "lim" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing store motion of y" "lim1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index bc69c4f..7518305 100644 (file)
@@ -10,6 +10,6 @@ int foo() {
                global.y += global.x*global.x;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of global.y" 1 "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Executing store motion of global.y" 1 "lim1" } } */
 /* XXX: We should also check for the load motion of global.x, but there is no easy way to do this.  */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } } */
index ea9b383..ae7aea2 100644 (file)
@@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ foo () {
   }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Deleting : vect_" 0 "dceloop2" } } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "dceloop\[1-2\]" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Deleting : vect_" 0 "dceloop3" } } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "dceloop\[1-3\]" } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */
index 42bb986..5446650 100644 (file)
@@ -45,6 +45,6 @@
 
       RETURN
       END
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "stride" 4 "lim" } }
-! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "stride" 4 "lim1" } }
+! { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "lim\[1-2\]" } }
 ! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "LES3D_DATA" } }