The code this is attempting to lock against does not use the BKL,
so it's not needed.
Most likely this code is still broken/racy (Al Viro also thinks so),
but removing the BKL should not make it worse than before.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
return -EINVAL;
}
- lock_kernel();
-
if (usbfs_mount && usbfs_mount->mnt_sb)
update_sb(usbfs_mount->mnt_sb);
- unlock_kernel();
-
return 0;
}