bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:23:07 +0000 (16:23 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Mon, 25 Dec 2017 13:26:32 +0000 (14:26 +0100)
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 468f6eafa6c44cb2c5d8aad35e12f06c240a812a ]

32-bit ALU ops operate on 32-bit values and have 32-bit outputs.
Adjust the verifier accordingly.

Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
kernel/bpf/verifier.c

index 1e2afb2..0c7e4c8 100644 (file)
@@ -1984,6 +1984,10 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
        return 0;
 }
 
+/* WARNING: This function does calculations on 64-bit values, but the actual
+ * execution may occur on 32-bit values. Therefore, things like bitshifts
+ * need extra checks in the 32-bit case.
+ */
 static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                                      struct bpf_insn *insn,
                                      struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
@@ -1994,12 +1998,8 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
        bool src_known, dst_known;
        s64 smin_val, smax_val;
        u64 umin_val, umax_val;
+       u64 insn_bitness = (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) ? 64 : 32;
 
-       if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
-               /* 32-bit ALU ops are (32,32)->64 */
-               coerce_reg_to_size(dst_reg, 4);
-               coerce_reg_to_size(&src_reg, 4);
-       }
        smin_val = src_reg.smin_value;
        smax_val = src_reg.smax_value;
        umin_val = src_reg.umin_value;
@@ -2135,9 +2135,9 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
                break;
        case BPF_LSH:
-               if (umax_val > 63) {
-                       /* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined.  This includes
-                        * shifts by a negative number.
+               if (umax_val >= insn_bitness) {
+                       /* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
+                        * This includes shifts by a negative number.
                         */
                        mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
                        break;
@@ -2163,9 +2163,9 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                __update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
                break;
        case BPF_RSH:
-               if (umax_val > 63) {
-                       /* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined.  This includes
-                        * shifts by a negative number.
+               if (umax_val >= insn_bitness) {
+                       /* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
+                        * This includes shifts by a negative number.
                         */
                        mark_reg_unknown(regs, insn->dst_reg);
                        break;
@@ -2201,6 +2201,12 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
                break;
        }
 
+       if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
+               /* 32-bit ALU ops are (32,32)->32 */
+               coerce_reg_to_size(dst_reg, 4);
+               coerce_reg_to_size(&src_reg, 4);
+       }
+
        __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg);
        __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg);
        return 0;