tree: Fix up get_narrower [PR96549]

My changes to get_narrower to support COMPOUND_EXPRs apparently
used a wrong type for the COMPOUND_EXPRs, while e.g. the rhs
type was unsigned short, the COMPOUND_EXPR got int type as that was the
original type of op.  The type of COMPOUND_EXPR should be always the type
of the rhs.

2020-08-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c/96549
	* tree.c (get_narrower): Use TREE_TYPE (ret) instead of
	TREE_TYPE (win) for COMPOUND_EXPRs.

	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr96549.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr96549.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr96549.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9d992a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr96549.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* PR c/96549 */
+
+long c = -1L;
+long b = 0L;
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  if (3L > (short) ((c ^= (b = 1L)) * 3L))
+    return 0;
+  __builtin_abort ();
+}

diff --git a/gcc/tree.c b/gcc/tree.c
index 6dea32a..d0202c3 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/tree.c
+++ b/gcc/tree.c
@@ -8877,7 +8877,7 @@ get_narrower (tree op, int *unsignedp_ptr)
        v.safe_push (op);
       FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_REVERSE (v, i, op)
        ret = build2_loc (EXPR_LOCATION (op), COMPOUND_EXPR,
-                         TREE_TYPE (win), TREE_OPERAND (op, 0),
+                         TREE_TYPE (ret), TREE_OPERAND (op, 0),
                          ret);
       return ret;
     }