Summary:
This patch fixes a regression introduced in r312904, where the formatter confuses
the `else` in `#else` with an `else` of an `if-else` statement.
For example, formatting this code with google style
```
#ifdef A
int f() {}
#else
int f() {}
#endif
```
resulted in
```
#ifdef A
int f() {}
#else
int f() {
}
#endif
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37973
llvm-svn: 314683
// Check that the current line allows merging. This depends on whether we
// are in a control flow statements as well as several style flags.
if (Line.First->isOneOf(tok::kw_else, tok::kw_case) ||
- (Line.First->Next && Line.First->Next->is(tok::kw_else)) ||
- (I != AnnotatedLines.begin() && I[-1]->Last->is(tok::kw_else)))
+ (Line.First->Next && Line.First->Next->is(tok::kw_else)))
return 0;
if (Line.First->isOneOf(tok::kw_if, tok::kw_while, tok::kw_do, tok::kw_try,
tok::kw___try, tok::kw_catch, tok::kw___finally,
"}",
Style);
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, KeepShortFunctionAfterPPElse) {
+ FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();
+ Style.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_All;
+ verifyFormat("#ifdef A\n"
+ "int f() {}\n"
+ "#else\n"
+ "int g() {}\n"
+ "#endif",
+ Style);
+}
TEST_F(FormatTest, SplitEmptyClass) {
FormatStyle Style = getLLVMStyle();