ACS-5 section
7.13.6.41 Words 85..87, 120: Commands and feature sets supported or enabled
states that:
If bit 15 of word 86 is set to one, bit 14 of word 119 is set to one,
and bit 15 of word 119 is cleared to zero, then word 119 is valid.
If bit 15 of word 86 is set to one, bit 14 of word 120 is set to one,
and bit 15 of word 120 is cleared to zero, then word 120 is valid.
(This text also exists in really old ACS standards, e.g. ACS-3.)
Currently, ata_id_sense_reporting_enabled() and
ata_id_has_sense_reporting() both check bit 15 of word 86,
but neither of them check that bit 14 of word 119 is set to one,
or that bit 15 of word 119 is cleared to zero.
Additionally, make ata_id_sense_reporting_enabled() return false
if !ata_id_has_sense_reporting(), similar to how e.g.
ata_id_flush_ext_enabled() returns false if !ata_id_has_flush_ext().
Fixes:
e87fd28cf9a2 ("libata: Implement support for sense data reporting")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
static inline bool ata_id_has_sense_reporting(const u16 *id)
{
- if (!(id[ATA_ID_CFS_ENABLE_2] & (1 << 15)))
+ if (!(id[ATA_ID_CFS_ENABLE_2] & BIT(15)))
+ return false;
+ if ((id[ATA_ID_COMMAND_SET_3] & (BIT(15) | BIT(14))) != BIT(14))
return false;
- return id[ATA_ID_COMMAND_SET_3] & (1 << 6);
+ return id[ATA_ID_COMMAND_SET_3] & BIT(6);
}
static inline bool ata_id_sense_reporting_enabled(const u16 *id)
{
- if (!(id[ATA_ID_CFS_ENABLE_2] & (1 << 15)))
+ if (!ata_id_has_sense_reporting(id))
+ return false;
+ /* ata_id_has_sense_reporting() == true, word 86 must have bit 15 set */
+ if ((id[ATA_ID_COMMAND_SET_4] & (BIT(15) | BIT(14))) != BIT(14))
return false;
- return id[ATA_ID_COMMAND_SET_4] & (1 << 6);
+ return id[ATA_ID_COMMAND_SET_4] & BIT(6);
}
/**