riscv*-*-* are the only modern targets that !HAVE_AS_LEB128 (apparently
due to some aggressive linker optimizations).
As the following testcase shows, we mishandle in index_rnglists the
!HAVE_AS_LEB128 && !have_multiple_function_sections case.
output_rnglists does roughly:
FOR_EACH_VEC_SAFE_ELT (ranges_table, i, r)
{
...
if (block_num > 0)
{
...
if (HAVE_AS_LEB128)
{
if (!have_multiple_function_sections)
{
// code not using r->*_entry
continue;
}
// code that sometimes doesn't use r->*_entry,
// sometimes r->begin_entry
}
else if (dwarf_split_debug_info)
{
// code that uses both r->begin_entry and r->end_entry
}
else
{
// code not using r->*_entry
}
}
else if (block_num < 0)
{
if (!have_multiple_function_sections)
gcc_unreachable ();
...
}
}
and index_rnglists is what sets up those r->{begin,end}_entry members.
The code did an early if (!have_multiple_function_sections) continue;
which is fine for the HAVE_AS_LEB128 case, because r->*_entry is not
used in that case, but not for !HAVE_AS_LEB128 that uses it anyway.
2022-01-20 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR debug/103874
* dwarf2out.cc (index_rnglists): For !HAVE_AS_LEB128 and
block_num > 0, index entry even if !have_multiple_function_sections.
* gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr103874.c: New test.
if (r->label && r->idx != DW_RANGES_IDX_SKELETON)
r->idx = rnglist_idx++;
- if (!have_multiple_function_sections)
- continue;
int block_num = r->num;
+ if ((HAVE_AS_LEB128 || block_num < 0)
+ && !have_multiple_function_sections)
+ continue;
if (HAVE_AS_LEB128 && (r->label || r->maybe_new_sec))
base = false;
if (block_num > 0)
--- /dev/null
+/* PR debug/103874 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -g -gsplit-dwarf -dA -Wno-implicit-function-declaration" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ {
+ bar ();
+ baz ();
+ }
+}