As per draft LoPAPR (Revision 2.9_pre7), section B.5.3 "Run Time
Abstraction Services (RTAS) Node" available at:
https://openpowerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/LoPAR-
20200611.pdf
... there are 2 device tree properties:
"ibm,max-associativity-domains"
which defines the maximum number of domains that the firmware i.e
PowerVM can support.
and:
"ibm,current-associativity-domains"
which defines the maximum number of domains that the current
platform can support.
The value of "ibm,max-associativity-domains" is always greater than or
equal to "ibm,current-associativity-domains" property. If the latter
property is not available, use "ibm,max-associativity-domain" as a
fallback. In this yet to be released LoPAPR, "ibm,current-associativity-domains"
is mentioned in page 833 / B.5.3 which is covered under under
"Appendix B. System Binding" section
Currently powerpc uses the "ibm,max-associativity-domains" property
while setting the possible number of nodes. This is currently set at
32. However the possible number of nodes for a platform may be
significantly less. Hence set the possible number of nodes based on
"ibm,current-associativity-domains" property.
Nathan Lynch had raised a valid concern that post LPM (Live Partition
Migration), a user could DLPAR add processors and memory after LPM
with "new" associativity properties:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/871rljfet9.fsf@linux.ibm.com/t/#u
He also pointed out that "ibm,max-associativity-domains" has the same
contents on all currently available PowerVM systems, unlike
"ibm,current-associativity-domains" and hence may be better able to
handle the new NUMA associativity properties.
However with the recent commit
dbce45628085 ("powerpc/numa: Limit
possible nodes to within num_possible_nodes"), all new NUMA
associativity properties are capped to initially set nr_node_ids.
Hence this commit should be safe with any new DLPAR add post LPM.
$ lsprop /proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,*associ*-domains
/proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,current-associativity-domains
00000005 00000001 00000002 00000002 00000002 00000010
/proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,max-associativity-domains
00000005 00000001 00000008 00000020 00000020 00000100
$ cat /sys/devices/system/node/possible ##Before patch
0-31
$ cat /sys/devices/system/node/possible ##After patch
0-1
Note the maximum nodes this platform can support is only 2 but the
possible nodes is set to 32.
This is important because lot of kernel and user space code allocate
structures for all possible nodes leading to a lot of memory that is
allocated but not used.
I ran a simple experiment to create and destroy 100 memory cgroups on
boot on a 8 node machine (Power8 Alpine).
Before patch:
free -k at boot
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem:
523498176 4106816
518820608 22272 570752
516606720
Swap: 4194240 0 4194240
free -k after creating 100 memory cgroups
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem:
523498176 4628416
518246464 22336 623296
516058688
Swap: 4194240 0 4194240
free -k after destroying 100 memory cgroups
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem:
523498176 4697408
518173760 22400 627008
515987904
Swap: 4194240 0 4194240
After patch:
free -k at boot
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem:
523498176 3969472
518933888 22272 594816
516731776
Swap: 4194240 0 4194240
free -k after creating 100 memory cgroups
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem:
523498176 4181888
518676096 22208 640192
516496448
Swap: 4194240 0 4194240
free -k after destroying 100 memory cgroups
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem:
523498176 4232320
518619904 22272 645952
516443264
Swap: 4194240 0 4194240
Observations:
Fixed kernel takes 137344 kb (4106816-3969472) less to boot.
Fixed kernel takes 309184 kb (4628416-4181888-137344) less to create 100 memcgs.
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Reformat change log a bit for readability]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817055257.110873-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com