+2005-09-24 Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
+
+ * convert.c (convert_to_integer): Don't test for ENUMERAL_TYPE in
+ NEGATE_EXPR/BIT_NOT_EXPR case.
+
2005-09-24 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* c-common.c (handle_mode_attribute): When not modifying in place,
/* This is not correct for ABS_EXPR,
since we must test the sign before truncation. */
{
- tree typex = type;
-
- /* Can't do arithmetic in enumeral types
- so use an integer type that will hold the values. */
- if (TREE_CODE (typex) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
- typex = lang_hooks.types.type_for_size
- (TYPE_PRECISION (typex), TYPE_UNSIGNED (typex));
-
- /* But now perhaps TYPEX is as wide as INPREC.
- In that case, do nothing special here.
- (Otherwise would recurse infinitely in convert. */
- if (TYPE_PRECISION (typex) != inprec)
- {
- /* Don't do unsigned arithmetic where signed was wanted,
- or vice versa. */
- if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
- typex = lang_hooks.types.unsigned_type (typex);
- else
- typex = lang_hooks.types.signed_type (typex);
- return convert (type,
- fold_build1 (ex_form, typex,
- convert (typex,
- TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))));
- }
+ tree typex;
+
+ /* Don't do unsigned arithmetic where signed was wanted,
+ or vice versa. */
+ if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
+ typex = lang_hooks.types.unsigned_type (type);
+ else
+ typex = lang_hooks.types.signed_type (type);
+ return convert (type,
+ fold_build1 (ex_form, typex,
+ convert (typex,
+ TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0))));
}
case NOP_EXPR: