[ Upstream commit
afe8605ca45424629fdddfd85984b442c763dc47 ]
There is one possible race window between zs_pool_dec_isolated() and
zs_unregister_migration() because wait_for_isolated_drain() checks the
isolated count without holding class->lock and there is no order inside
zs_pool_dec_isolated(). Thus the below race window could be possible:
zs_pool_dec_isolated zs_unregister_migration
check pool->destroying != 0
pool->destroying = true;
smp_mb();
wait_for_isolated_drain()
wait for pool->isolated_pages == 0
atomic_long_dec(&pool->isolated_pages);
atomic_long_read(&pool->isolated_pages) == 0
Since we observe the pool->destroying (false) before atomic_long_dec()
for pool->isolated_pages, waking pool->migration_wait up is missed.
Fix this by ensure checking pool->destroying happens after the
atomic_long_dec(&pool->isolated_pages).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210708115027.7557-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 701d678599d0 ("mm/zsmalloc.c: fix race condition in zs_destroy_pool")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Henry Burns <henryburns@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
VM_BUG_ON(atomic_long_read(&pool->isolated_pages) <= 0);
atomic_long_dec(&pool->isolated_pages);
/*
- * There's no possibility of racing, since wait_for_isolated_drain()
- * checks the isolated count under &class->lock after enqueuing
- * on migration_wait.
+ * Checking pool->destroying must happen after atomic_long_dec()
+ * for pool->isolated_pages above. Paired with the smp_mb() in
+ * zs_unregister_migration().
*/
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
if (atomic_long_read(&pool->isolated_pages) == 0 && pool->destroying)
wake_up_all(&pool->migration_wait);
}