libdwfl: Use 64bit GElf_Addr instead of size_t to calculate address.

size_t is too small on 32 bit systems to analyze a 64 bit core file.

Signed-off-by: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>

diff --git a/libdwfl/ChangeLog b/libdwfl/ChangeLog
index a5cffc4..67a4d74 100644 (file)
--- a/libdwfl/ChangeLog
+++ b/libdwfl/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2020-11-28  Mark Wielaard  <mark@klomp.org>
+
+       * dwfl_segment_report_module.c (dwfl_segment_report_module):
+       Use GElf_Addr to calculate note_vaddr instead of size_t.
+
 2020-11-26  Timm Bäder  <tbaeder@redhat.com>
 
        * dwfl_segment_report_module.c (dwfl_segment_report_module):

diff --git a/libdwfl/dwfl_segment_report_module.c b/libdwfl/dwfl_segment_report_module.c
index 8d99e3b..ee9cfa2 100644 (file)
--- a/libdwfl/dwfl_segment_report_module.c
+++ b/libdwfl/dwfl_segment_report_module.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ dwfl_segment_report_module (Dwfl *dwfl, int ndx, const char *name,
 
               /* We calculate from the p_offset of the note segment,
                because we don't yet know the bias for its p_vaddr.  */
-              const size_t note_vaddr = start + offset;
+              const GElf_Addr note_vaddr = start + offset;
               void *data;
               size_t data_size;
               if (read_portion (&read_state, &data, &data_size,