According to Devicetree Specification v0.2 document:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model."
Do as suggested in the binding example.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Example 1: PFUZE100
- pmic: pfuze100@8 {
+ pfuze100: pmic@8 {
compatible = "fsl,pfuze100";
reg = <0x08>;
Example 2: PFUZE200
- pmic: pfuze200@8 {
+ pfuze200: pmic@8 {
compatible = "fsl,pfuze200";
reg = <0x08>;
Example 3: PFUZE3000
- pmic: pfuze3000@8 {
+ pfuze3000: pmic@8 {
compatible = "fsl,pfuze3000";
reg = <0x08>;