memcg: mem_cgroup_move_parent() doesn't need gfp_mask
authorKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:42:45 +0000 (16:42 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:42:42 +0000 (18:42 -0700)
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
mm/memcontrol.c

index a1f00f0..9647866 100644 (file)
@@ -2643,8 +2643,7 @@ out:
 
 static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page *page,
                                  struct page_cgroup *pc,
-                                 struct mem_cgroup *child,
-                                 gfp_t gfp_mask)
+                                 struct mem_cgroup *child)
 {
        struct mem_cgroup *parent;
        unsigned int nr_pages;
@@ -3652,7 +3651,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
                pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
 
-               ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
+               ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg);
 
                if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -EINVAL) {
                        /* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */