In the offending fixes commit I mistakenly removed the reply message of
the port new command. I was under impression it is a new port
notification, partly due to the "notify" in the name of the helper
function. Bring the code sending reply with new port message back, this
time putting it directly to devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit()
Fixes: c496daeb8630 ("devlink: remove duplicate port notification")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230531142025.2605001-1-jiri@resnulli.us
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
static int mlx5_sf_add(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, struct mlx5_sf_table *table,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *new_attr,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **dl_port)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch;
struct mlx5_sf *sf;
new_attr->controller, new_attr->sfnum);
if (err)
goto esw_err;
+ *dl_port = &sf->dl_port;
trace_mlx5_sf_add(dev, sf->port_index, sf->controller, sf->hw_fn_id, new_attr->sfnum);
return 0;
int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_new(struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *new_attr,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **dl_port)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
struct mlx5_sf_table *table;
"Port add is only supported in eswitch switchdev mode or SF ports are disabled.");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
- err = mlx5_sf_add(dev, table, new_attr, extack);
+ err = mlx5_sf_add(dev, table, new_attr, extack, dl_port);
mlx5_sf_table_put(table);
return err;
}
int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_new(struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *add_attr,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **dl_port);
int mlx5_devlink_sf_port_del(struct devlink *devlink,
struct devlink_port *dl_port,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
* @devlink: Devlink instance
* @attrs: attributes of the new port
* @extack: extack for reporting error messages
+ * @devlink_port: pointer to store new devlink port pointer
*
* Devlink core will call this device driver function upon user request
* to create a new port function of a specified flavor and optional
*/
int (*port_new)(struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_port_new_attrs *attrs,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
+ struct devlink_port **devlink_port);
/**
* Rate control callbacks.
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
struct devlink_port_new_attrs new_attrs = {};
struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
+ struct devlink_port *devlink_port;
+ struct sk_buff *msg;
+ int err;
if (!devlink->ops->port_new)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
new_attrs.sfnum_valid = true;
}
- return devlink->ops->port_new(devlink, &new_attrs, extack);
+ err = devlink->ops->port_new(devlink, &new_attrs,
+ extack, &devlink_port);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!msg) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_out_port_del;
+ }
+ err = devlink_nl_port_fill(msg, devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW,
+ info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0, NULL);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
+ goto err_out_msg_free;
+ err = genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_out_port_del;
+ return 0;
+
+err_out_msg_free:
+ nlmsg_free(msg);
+err_out_port_del:
+ devlink_port->ops->port_del(devlink, devlink_port, NULL);
+ return err;
}
static int devlink_nl_cmd_port_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,