/* read_user_ptr may take the mm->mmap_lock.
* release srbm_mutex to avoid circular dependency between
- * srbm_mutex->mm_sem->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
+ * srbm_mutex->mmap_lock->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
*/
release_queue(adev);
valid_wptr = read_user_wptr(mm, wptr, wptr_val);
/* read_user_ptr may take the mm->mmap_lock.
* release srbm_mutex to avoid circular dependency between
- * srbm_mutex->mm_sem->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
+ * srbm_mutex->mmap_lock->reservation_ww_class_mutex->srbm_mutex.
*/
release_queue(adev);
valid_wptr = read_user_wptr(mm, wptr, wptr_val);
* @bo: The buffer object
* @vmf: The fault structure handed to the callback
*
- * vm callbacks like fault() and *_mkwrite() allow for the mm_sem to be dropped
+ * vm callbacks like fault() and *_mkwrite() allow for the mmap_lock to be dropped
* during long waits, and after the wait the callback will be restarted. This
* is to allow other threads using the same virtual memory space concurrent
* access to map(), unmap() completely unrelated buffer objects. TTM buffer
* the same as 'old', the other will be the new one that is trying
* to share the anon_vma.
*
- * NOTE! This runs with mm_sem held for reading, so it is possible that
+ * NOTE! This runs with mmap_lock held for reading, so it is possible that
* the anon_vma of 'old' is concurrently in the process of being set up
* by another page fault trying to merge _that_. But that's ok: if it
* is being set up, that automatically means that it will be a singleton
*
* We also make sure that the two vma's are compatible (adjacent,
* and with the same memory policies). That's all stable, even with just
- * a read lock on the mm_sem.
+ * a read lock on the mmap_lock.
*/
static struct anon_vma *reusable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *old, struct vm_area_struct *a, struct vm_area_struct *b)
{