Commit
603f000b15f2 changed xfs_ioctl_setattr_check_extsize to reject an
attempt to set an EXTSZINHERIT extent size hint on a directory with
RTINHERIT set if the hint isn't a multiple of the realtime extent size.
However, I have recently discovered that it is possible to change the
realtime extent size when adding a rt device to a filesystem, which
means that the existence of directories with misaligned inherited hints
is not an accident.
As a result, it's possible that someone could have set a valid hint and
added an rt volume with a different rt extent size, which invalidates
the ondisk hints. After such a sequence, FSGETXATTR will report a
misaligned hint, which FSSETXATTR will trip over, causing confusion if
the user was doing the usual GET/SET sequence to change some other
attribute. Change xfs_fill_fsxattr to omit the hint if it isn't aligned
properly.
Fixes: 603f000b15f2 ("xfs: validate extsz hints against rt extent size when rtinherit is set")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
fileattr_fill_xflags(fa, xfs_ip2xflags(ip));
- fa->fsx_extsize = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_extsize);
+ if (ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSIZE) {
+ fa->fsx_extsize = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_extsize);
+ } else if (ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT) {
+ /*
+ * Don't let a misaligned extent size hint on a directory
+ * escape to userspace if it won't pass the setattr checks
+ * later.
+ */
+ if ((ip->i_diflags & XFS_DIFLAG_RTINHERIT) &&
+ ip->i_extsize % mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize > 0) {
+ fa->fsx_xflags &= ~(FS_XFLAG_EXTSIZE |
+ FS_XFLAG_EXTSZINHERIT);
+ fa->fsx_extsize = 0;
+ } else {
+ fa->fsx_extsize = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_extsize);
+ }
+ }
+
if (ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE)
fa->fsx_cowextsize = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, ip->i_cowextsize);
fa->fsx_projid = ip->i_projid;