powerpc/64s/perf: add power_pmu_wants_prompt_pmi to say whether perf wants PMIs to...

Interrupt code enables MSR[EE] in some irq handlers while keeping local
irqs disabled via soft-mask, allowing PMI interrupts to be taken as
soft-NMI to improve profiling of irq handlers.

When perf is not enabled, there is no point to doing this, it's
additional overhead. So provide a function that can say if PMIs should
be taken promptly if possible.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210922145452.352571-4-npiggin@gmail.com

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 7a2690e..8d6f801 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -342,6 +342,8 @@ static inline bool lazy_irq_pending_nocheck(void)
        return __lazy_irq_pending(local_paca->irq_happened);
 }
 
+bool power_pmu_wants_prompt_pmi(void);
+
 /*
  * This is called by asynchronous interrupts to conditionally
  * re-enable hard interrupts after having cleared the source

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 1f1ded2..07fd61a 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <asm/code-patching.h>
+#include <asm/hw_irq.h>
 #include <asm/interrupt.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
@@ -2437,6 +2438,36 @@ static void perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
        perf_sample_event_took(sched_clock() - start_clock);
 }
 
+/*
+ * If the perf subsystem wants performance monitor interrupts as soon as
+ * possible (e.g., to sample the instruction address and stack chain),
+ * this should return true. The IRQ masking code can then enable MSR[EE]
+ * in some places (e.g., interrupt handlers) that allows PMI interrupts
+ * though to improve accuracy of profiles, at the cost of some performance.
+ *
+ * The PMU counters can be enabled by other means (e.g., sysfs raw SPR
+ * access), but in that case there is no need for prompt PMI handling.
+ *
+ * This currently returns true if any perf counter is being used. It
+ * could possibly return false if only events are being counted rather than
+ * samples being taken, but for now this is good enough.
+ */
+bool power_pmu_wants_prompt_pmi(void)
+{
+       struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
+
+       /*
+        * This could simply test local_paca->pmcregs_in_use if that were not
+        * under ifdef KVM.
+        */
+
+       if (!ppmu)
+               return false;
+
+       cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+       return cpuhw->n_events;
+}
+
 static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
        struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);