Works fine since the previous commit fixed the underlying range data
type. Of course it filters out nothing, but so does
0..1,2..0xffffffffffffffff, and we don't bother rejecting that either.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
g_assert_false(qemu_log_in_addr_range(UINT64_MAX - 1));
qemu_set_dfilter_ranges("0..0xffffffffffffffff", &err);
- error_free_or_abort(&err);
-
+ g_assert(qemu_log_in_addr_range(0));
+ g_assert(qemu_log_in_addr_range(UINT64_MAX));
+
qemu_set_dfilter_ranges("2..1", &err);
error_free_or_abort(&err);
default:
g_assert_not_reached();
}
- if (lob > upb || (lob == 0 && upb == UINT64_MAX)) {
+ if (lob > upb) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid range");
goto out;
}