The continue statement in the for-loop is redundant. Re-work the hw_lock
check to remove it.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Continue has no effect")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
- if (hw_lock) {
- /* Somebody is holding the lock */
- usleep_range(10000, 20000);
- continue;
- } else {
+ if (!hw_lock)
break;
- }
+
+ /* Somebody is holding the lock */
+ usleep_range(10000, 20000);
}
return !hw_lock;