In ocfs2_write_end_nolock(), there are an if statement on lines 1976,
2047 and 2058, to check whether handle is NULL:
if (handle)
When handle is NULL, it is used on line 2045:
ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 1);
oi->i_sync_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
Thus, a possible null-pointer dereference may occur.
To fix this bug, handle is checked before calling
ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans().
This bug is found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by us.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726033705.32307-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = current_time(inode);
di->i_mtime = di->i_ctime = cpu_to_le64(inode->i_mtime.tv_sec);
di->i_mtime_nsec = di->i_ctime_nsec = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec);
- ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 1);
+ if (handle)
+ ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 1);
}
if (handle)
ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, wc->w_di_bh);