perf test: Convert bpf tests to test cases.
authorIan Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Thu, 4 Nov 2021 06:41:59 +0000 (23:41 -0700)
committerArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:11:49 +0000 (18:11 -0300)
Use null terminated array of test cases rather than the previous sub
test functions.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Tested-by: Sohaib Mohamed <sohaib.amhmd@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104064208.3156807-14-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
tools/perf/tests/bpf.c

index 442562d..e6691ed 100644 (file)
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ static int llseek_loop(void)
 
 static struct {
        enum test_llvm__testcase prog_id;
-       const char *desc;
        const char *name;
        const char *msg_compile_fail;
        const char *msg_load_fail;
@@ -72,7 +71,6 @@ static struct {
 } bpf_testcase_table[] = {
        {
                .prog_id          = LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE,
-               .desc             = "Basic BPF filtering",
                .name             = "[basic_bpf_test]",
                .msg_compile_fail = "fix 'perf test LLVM' first",
                .msg_load_fail    = "load bpf object failed",
@@ -81,7 +79,6 @@ static struct {
        },
        {
                .prog_id          = LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE,
-               .desc             = "BPF pinning",
                .name             = "[bpf_pinning]",
                .msg_compile_fail = "fix kbuild first",
                .msg_load_fail    = "check your vmlinux setting?",
@@ -92,7 +89,6 @@ static struct {
 #ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
        {
                .prog_id          = LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_PROLOGUE,
-               .desc             = "BPF prologue generation",
                .name             = "[bpf_prologue_test]",
                .msg_compile_fail = "fix kbuild first",
                .msg_load_fail    = "check your vmlinux setting?",
@@ -283,18 +279,6 @@ out:
        return ret;
 }
 
-static int test__bpf_subtest_get_nr(void)
-{
-       return (int)ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_testcase_table);
-}
-
-static const char *test__bpf_subtest_get_desc(int i)
-{
-       if (i < 0 || i >= (int)ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_testcase_table))
-               return NULL;
-       return bpf_testcase_table[i].desc;
-}
-
 static int check_env(void)
 {
        int err;
@@ -325,7 +309,7 @@ static int check_env(void)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static int test__bpf(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int i)
+static int test__bpf(int i)
 {
        int err;
 
@@ -343,31 +327,61 @@ static int test__bpf(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int i)
        err = __test__bpf(i);
        return err;
 }
+#endif
 
-#else
-static int test__bpf_subtest_get_nr(void)
+static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
+                               int subtest __maybe_unused)
 {
-       return 0;
+#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+       return test__bpf(0);
+#else
+       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+       return TEST_SKIP;
+#endif
 }
 
-static const char *test__bpf_subtest_get_desc(int i __maybe_unused)
+static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
+                            int subtest __maybe_unused)
 {
-       return NULL;
+#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+       return test__bpf(1);
+#else
+       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+       return TEST_SKIP;
+#endif
 }
 
-static int test__bpf(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int i __maybe_unused)
+static int test__bpf_prologue_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
+                                  int subtest __maybe_unused)
 {
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE)
+       return test__bpf(2);
+#else
        pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
        return TEST_SKIP;
+#endif
 }
+
+
+static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
+#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+       TEST_CASE("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test),
+       TEST_CASE("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning),
+#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
+       TEST_CASE("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test),
+#else
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
 #endif
+#else
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in"),
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in"),
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled in"),
+#endif
+       { .name = NULL, }
+};
 
 struct test_suite suite__bpf = {
        .desc = "BPF filter",
-       .func = test__bpf,
-       .subtest = {
-               .skip_if_fail   = true,
-               .get_nr         = test__bpf_subtest_get_nr,
-               .get_desc       = test__bpf_subtest_get_desc,
-       },
+       .test_cases = bpf_tests,
+       .subtest = { .skip_if_fail = true, },
 };