RDMA/rxe: Rename rxe_atomic_reply to atomic_reply

It's better to use the unified naming format.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705145212.12014-2-yangx.jy@fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
index 5536582..265e46f 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static struct resp_res *rxe_prepare_res(struct rxe_qp *qp,
 /* Guarantee atomicity of atomic operations at the machine level. */
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(atomic_ops_lock);
 
-static enum resp_states rxe_atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
+static enum resp_states atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
                                         struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt)
 {
        u64 *vaddr;
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int rxe_responder(void *arg)
                        state = read_reply(qp, pkt);
                        break;
                case RESPST_ATOMIC_REPLY:
-                       state = rxe_atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
+                       state = atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
                        break;
                case RESPST_ACKNOWLEDGE:
                        state = acknowledge(qp, pkt);