Not 100% sure, but I think being an unsigned literal will help:
CID 1358505 (#1 of 1): Unintended sign extension
(SIGN_EXTENSION)sign_extension: Suspicious implicit sign extension:
load1->def.num_components with type unsigned char (8 bits, unsigned) is
promoted in load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size / 8) to
type int (32 bits, signed), then sign-extended to type unsigned long (64
bits, unsigned). If load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size /
8) is greater than 0x7FFFFFFF, the upper bits of the result will all be
1.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robclark@freedesktop.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
return false;
return memcmp(load1->value.f32, load2->value.f32,
- load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size / 8)) == 0;
+ load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size / 8u)) == 0;
}
case nir_instr_type_phi: {
nir_phi_instr *phi1 = nir_instr_as_phi(instr1);