In r259975 we rauw'ed the scope of enum declarations without taking into
account that DIBuilder strips out scope references that point to the
DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.
This testcase guards against making the same mistake again.
<rdar://problem/
25078246>
llvm-svn: 264366
enum class B: unsigned long { B1=1 }; // underlying type is unsigned long
enum C { C1 = 1 };
enum D : short; // enum forward declaration
+enum Z : int;
A a;
B b;
C c;
// CHECK-NOT: offset:
// CHECK-SAME: flags: DIFlagFwdDecl
+// CHECK: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_enumeration_type, name: "Z"
+// CHECK-NOT: scope:
+// CHECK-SAME: flags: DIFlagFwdDecl
+void fz() { Z z; }
+
namespace test5 {
// CHECK: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_enumeration_type, name: "E"
// CHECK-SAME: scope: [[TEST5:![0-9]+]]