Fix comments/ChangeLog entry for last night's change.

From-SVN: r26320

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 12b0d4d..17658b5 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Thu Apr  8 19:20:18 1999  Jeffrey A Law  (law@cygnus.com)
        Do not try to optimize a aggregate address which has VOIDmode.
        Mirrors March 23 change to expand_assignment.
 
-       * flow.c (delete_unreachable_blocks): Do not require an edge to
-       be marked with EDGE_FALLTHRU when tidying an edge which connects
-       consecutive basic blocks.
+       * flow.c (delete_unreachable_blocks): Do not require EDGE_FALLTHRU
+       for an edge when tidying an edge which connects consecutive basic
+       blocks.
 
        * flow.c (can_delete_label_p): Do not convert a label into a
        deleted label here.

diff --git a/gcc/flow.c b/gcc/flow.c
index daf3571..64350b0 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/flow.c
+++ b/gcc/flow.c
@@ -1563,10 +1563,9 @@ delete_unreachable_blocks ()
         out edge for the block which ended with the conditional
         branch (since we do not create duplicate edges).
 
-        Furthermore, because we create the edge for the jump to the
-        label before the fallthrough edge, we will only see the
-        jump edge.  So we do not want to check that the edge is a 
-        FALLTHRU edge.  */
+        Furthermore, the edge will be marked as a fallthru because we
+        merge the flags for the duplicate edges.  So we do not want to
+        check that the edge is not a FALLTHRU edge.  */
       if ((s = b->succ) != NULL
          && s->succ_next == NULL
          && s->dest == c)