When mm destruction happens, we should pass mm_update_next_owner() the old mm.
But unfortunately new mm is passed in exec_mmap().
Thus, kernel panic is possible when a multi-threaded process uses exec().
Also, the owner member comment description is wrong. mm->owner does not
necessarily point to the thread group leader.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
Cc: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
tsk->active_mm = mm;
activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
task_unlock(tsk);
- mm_update_next_owner(mm);
+ mm_update_next_owner(old_mm);
arch_pick_mmap_layout(mm);
if (old_mm) {
up_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
rwlock_t ioctx_list_lock; /* aio lock */
struct kioctx *ioctx_list;
#ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER
- struct task_struct *owner; /* The thread group leader that */
- /* owns the mm_struct. */
+ /*
+ * "owner" points to a task that is regarded as the canonical
+ * user/owner of this mm. All of the following must be true in
+ * order for it to be changed:
+ *
+ * current == mm->owner
+ * current->mm != mm
+ * new_owner->mm == mm
+ * new_owner->alloc_lock is held
+ */
+ struct task_struct *owner;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS