drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c: fix error caused by shifted mask

During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation
was used.  The last week some integration tests were done and this
problem was found.  It turned out that the released register
documentation is wrong.

The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.

Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
index ee14662..98cae52 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
@@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
        {
                .name = "led_1",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(7),
+               .mask = BIT(6),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_2",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(6),
+               .mask = BIT(5),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_3",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(5),
+               .mask = BIT(4),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_4",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(4),
+               .mask = BIT(3),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_5",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(3),
+               .mask = BIT(2),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_6",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(2),
+               .mask = BIT(1),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_7",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(1),
+               .mask = BIT(0),
        }
 };