Btrfs: avoid unnecessarily locking inode when clearing a range
authorFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Thu, 27 Jul 2017 18:52:55 +0000 (19:52 +0100)
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Fri, 18 Aug 2017 14:36:29 +0000 (16:36 +0200)
If the range being cleared was not marked for defrag and we are not
about to clear the range from the defrag status, we don't need to
lock and unlock the inode.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs/btrfs/inode.c

index fa4b256..6747292 100644 (file)
@@ -1801,10 +1801,11 @@ static void btrfs_clear_bit_hook(void *private_data,
        u64 len = state->end + 1 - state->start;
        u32 num_extents = count_max_extents(len);
 
-       spin_lock(&inode->lock);
-       if ((state->state & EXTENT_DEFRAG) && (*bits & EXTENT_DEFRAG))
+       if ((state->state & EXTENT_DEFRAG) && (*bits & EXTENT_DEFRAG)) {
+               spin_lock(&inode->lock);
                inode->defrag_bytes -= len;
-       spin_unlock(&inode->lock);
+               spin_unlock(&inode->lock);
+       }
 
        /*
         * set_bit and clear bit hooks normally require _irqsave/restore