[ Upstream commit
ee879be38bc87f8cedc79ae2742958db6533ca59 ]
In https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
20211209150910.GA23668@axis.com/
Vincent's patch commented on, and worked around, a bug toggling
static_branch's, when a 2nd PRINTK-ish flag was added. The bug
results in a premature static_branch_disable when the 1st of 2 flags
was disabled.
The cited commit computed newflags, but then in the JUMP_LABEL block,
failed to use that result, instead using just one of the terms in it.
Using newflags instead made the code work properly.
This is Vincents test-case, reduced. It needs the 2nd flag to
demonstrate the bug, but it's explanatory here.
pt_test() {
echo 5 > /sys/module/dynamic_debug/verbose
site="module tcp" # just one callsite
echo " $site =_ " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control # clear it
# A B ~A ~B
for flg in +T +p "-T #broke here" -p; do
echo " $site $flg " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
done;
# A B ~B ~A
for flg in +T +p "-p #broke here" -T; do
echo " $site $flg " > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
done
}
pt_test
Fixes:
84da83a6ffc0 dyndbg: combine flags & mask into a struct, simplify with it
CC: vincent.whitchurch@axis.com
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220904214134.408619-2-jim.cromie@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
continue;
#ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL
if (dp->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT) {
- if (!(modifiers->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT))
+ if (!(newflags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT))
static_branch_disable(&dp->key.dd_key_true);
- } else if (modifiers->flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)
+ } else if (newflags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT) {
static_branch_enable(&dp->key.dd_key_true);
+ }
#endif
dp->flags = newflags;
v2pr_info("changed %s:%d [%s]%s =%s\n",