Remove executive summary.

It isn't necessarily that hashing the whole string is the main problem, as the
recently added java string benchmark appears to show, which means the original
purpose of this benchmark is rather voided.

This removal allows gradually repurposing the test towards providing general
benchmarks of QHash performance.

Change-Id: Iaab0a3b493387dcce99240632342235ed9c44d88
Reviewed-by: João Abecasis <joao.abecasis@nokia.com>

diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/corelib/tools/qhash/main.cpp b/tests/benchmarks/corelib/tools/qhash/main.cpp
index 463f163..412f071 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/benchmarks/corelib/tools/qhash/main.cpp
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/corelib/tools/qhash/main.cpp
@@ -39,33 +39,6 @@
 **
 ****************************************************************************/
 
-/*
-
-////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-
-This benchmark serves as reality check on the idea that hashing the complete
-string is a good idea.
-
-  Executive summary: It is not a good idea.
-
-////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-
-********* Start testing of tst_QHash *********
-Config: Using QTest library 5.0.0, Qt 5.0.0
-PASS   : tst_QHash::initTestCase()
-RESULT : tst_QHash::qhash_qt4():
-     0.041 msecs per iteration (total: 85, iterations: 2048)
-PASS   : tst_QHash::qhash_qt4()
-RESULT : tst_QHash::qhash_faster():
-     0.0122 msecs per iteration (total: 100, iterations: 8192)
-PASS   : tst_QHash::qhash_faster()
-PASS   : tst_QHash::cleanupTestCase()
-Totals: 4 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped
-
-////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-
-*/
-
 #include "main.h"
 
 #include <QFile>