Thread-specific breakpoints: say "no longer in the thread list" instead of "gone".

It seems "gone" may confuse people, while that was exactly what it was
trying to avoid.  Switch to saying "no longer in the thread list",
which is really the predicate GDB uses.

gdb/
2013-10-07  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>

	PR breakpoints/11568
	* breakpoint.c (remove_threaded_breakpoints): Say "no longer in
	the thread list" instead of "gone".

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index a433b46..9c3d419 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2013-10-07  Pedro Alves  <palves@redhat.com>
+
+       PR breakpoints/11568
+       * breakpoint.c (remove_threaded_breakpoints): Say "no longer in
+       the thread list" instead of "gone".
+
 2013-10-06  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>
 
        * NEWS: Mention new convenience variable $_exitsignal.

diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index b98ca9e..d3e9e49 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -2943,7 +2943,7 @@ remove_threaded_breakpoints (struct thread_info *tp, int silent)
          b->disposition = disp_del_at_next_stop;
 
          printf_filtered (_("\
-Thread-specific breakpoint %d deleted - thread %d is gone.\n"),
+Thread-specific breakpoint %d deleted - thread %d no longer in the thread list.\n"),
                          b->number, tp->num);
 
          /* Hide it from the user.  */