genirq: Move irq resource handling out of spinlocked region
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:33:38 +0000 (23:33 +0200)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:46:16 +0000 (12:46 +0200)
Aside of being conceptually wrong, there is also an actual (hard to
trigger and mostly theoretical) problem.

CPU0 CPU1
free_irq(X) interrupt X
spin_lock(desc->lock)
wake irq thread()
spin_unlock(desc->lock)
spin_lock(desc->lock)
remove action()
shutdown_irq()
release_resources() thread_handler()
spin_unlock(desc->lock)   access released resources.

synchronize_irq()

Move the release resources invocation after synchronize_irq() so it's
guaranteed that the threaded handler has finished.

Move the resource request call out of the desc->lock held region as well,
so the invocation context is the same for both request and release.

This solves the problems with those functions on RT as well.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629214344.117028181@linutronix.de
kernel/irq/manage.c

index 0139908..3e69343 100644 (file)
@@ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
                new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
 
        mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
+       if (!desc->action) {
+               ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
+               if (ret) {
+                       pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
+                              new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
+                       goto out_mutex;
+               }
+       }
 
        chip_bus_lock(desc);
 
@@ -1271,13 +1279,6 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
        }
 
        if (!shared) {
-               ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
-               if (ret) {
-                       pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
-                              new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
-                       goto out_unlock;
-               }
-
                init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads);
 
                /* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */
@@ -1386,6 +1387,10 @@ out_unlock:
 
        chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
 
+       if (!desc->action)
+               irq_release_resources(desc);
+
+out_mutex:
        mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
 
 out_thread:
@@ -1484,7 +1489,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
        if (!desc->action) {
                irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc);
                irq_shutdown(desc);
-               irq_release_resources(desc);
                irq_remove_timings(desc);
        }
 
@@ -1527,6 +1531,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
                }
        }
 
+       if (!desc->action)
+               irq_release_resources(desc);
+
        mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
 
        irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);