I noticed that bppy_get_visibility and gdbpy_breakpoint_created
implemented their own visibility checks, but subtly different from
user_breakpoint_p. I think the latter is more correct, and so changed
the Python code to use it.
I suspect there isn't a decent way to test this, so no new test.
Built and regtested on x86-64 Fedora 23.
2016-07-13 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* python/py-breakpoint.c (bppy_get_visibility)
(gdbpy_breakpoint_created): Use user_breakpoint_p.
2016-07-13 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
+ * python/py-breakpoint.c (bppy_get_visibility)
+ (gdbpy_breakpoint_created): Use user_breakpoint_p.
+
+2016-07-13 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
+
PR cli/18053:
* jit.c (jit_reader_load_command): Use tilde_expand.
(_initialize_jit): Fix help for jit-reader-unload. Set completer
BPPY_REQUIRE_VALID (self_bp);
- if (self_bp->bp->number < 0)
- Py_RETURN_FALSE;
+ if (user_breakpoint_p (self_bp->bp))
+ Py_RETURN_TRUE;
- Py_RETURN_TRUE;
+ Py_RETURN_FALSE;
}
/* Python function to determine if the breakpoint is a temporary
gdbpy_breakpoint_object *newbp;
PyGILState_STATE state;
- if (bp->number < 0 && bppy_pending_object == NULL)
+ if (!user_breakpoint_p (bp) && bppy_pending_object == NULL)
return;
if (bp->type != bp_breakpoint