io_uring: pin SQPOLL data before unlocking ring lock
authorJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:08:51 +0000 (13:08 -0600)
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tue, 14 Sep 2021 01:44:29 +0000 (19:44 -0600)
We need to re-check sqd->thread after we've dropped the lock. Pin
the sqd before doing the lockdep lock dance, and check if the thread
is alive after that. It's either NULL or alive, as the SQPOLL thread
cannot exit without holding the same sqd->lock.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+337de45f13a4fd54d708@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: fa84693b3c89 ("io_uring: ensure IORING_REGISTER_IOWQ_MAX_WORKERS works with SQPOLL")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
fs/io_uring.c

index 66a7414..a864a94 100644 (file)
@@ -10563,10 +10563,12 @@ static int io_register_iowq_max_workers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
                         * ordering. Fine to drop uring_lock here, we hold
                         * a ref to the ctx.
                         */
+                       refcount_inc(&sqd->refs);
                        mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
                        mutex_lock(&sqd->lock);
                        mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
-                       tctx = sqd->thread->io_uring;
+                       if (sqd->thread)
+                               tctx = sqd->thread->io_uring;
                }
        } else {
                tctx = current->io_uring;
@@ -10580,16 +10582,20 @@ static int io_register_iowq_max_workers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
        if (ret)
                goto err;
 
-       if (sqd)
+       if (sqd) {
                mutex_unlock(&sqd->lock);
+               io_put_sq_data(sqd);
+       }
 
        if (copy_to_user(arg, new_count, sizeof(new_count)))
                return -EFAULT;
 
        return 0;
 err:
-       if (sqd)
+       if (sqd) {
                mutex_unlock(&sqd->lock);
+               io_put_sq_data(sqd);
+       }
        return ret;
 }