This patch reorganises the sa1111_resume() function in a manner the spinlock
happens after calling the sa1111_wake(). This fixes two bugs:
1) This function called sa1111_wake() which tried to claim the same spinlock
the sa1111_resume() already claimed. This would result in certain deadlock.
Original idea for this part: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2) The function didn't unlock the spinlock in case the chip didn't report
correct ID.
Original idea for this part: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
if (!save)
return 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sachip->lock, flags);
-
/*
* Ensure that the SA1111 is still here.
* FIXME: shouldn't do this here.
* First of all, wake up the chip.
*/
sa1111_wake(sachip);
+
+ /*
+ * Only lock for write ops. Also, sa1111_wake must be called with
+ * released spinlock!
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sachip->lock, flags);
+
sa1111_writel(0, sachip->base + SA1111_INTC + SA1111_INTEN0);
sa1111_writel(0, sachip->base + SA1111_INTC + SA1111_INTEN1);