staging: lustre: llite: remove obsolete comment for ll_unlink()
authorJohn L. Hammond <john.hammond@intel.com>
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 00:04:48 +0000 (19:04 -0500)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:01:37 +0000 (13:01 +0100)
Remove obsolete comments about the behavior of ll_unlink()

Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <john.hammond@intel.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-8003
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/19881
Reviewed-by: Andrew Perepechko <andrew.perepechko@seagate.com>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c

index f925656..fc17654 100644 (file)
@@ -994,11 +994,6 @@ static int ll_create_nd(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
        return rc;
 }
 
-/* ll_unlink() doesn't update the inode with the new link count.
- * Instead, ll_ddelete() and ll_d_iput() will update it based upon if there
- * is any lock existing. They will recycle dentries and inodes based upon locks
- * too. b=20433
- */
 static int ll_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dchild)
 {
        struct ptlrpc_request *request = NULL;