sh: kfr2r09: use MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT instead of TMIO own flag

TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE is equivalent to MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT.

The flag is propagated as follows:
    tmio_mmc_data::capabilities2 -> mmc_host::caps2

Only the difference is the TMIO_... makes tmio_mmc_get_ro() return 0
(i.e. it does not affect mmc_gpio_get_ro() at all), while MMC_CAP2_...
returns 0 before calling ->get_ro() hook (i.e. it affects both IP own
logic and GPIO detection).

The TMIO MMC drivers do not set-up gpio_ro by themselves, so gpio_ro
is obviously unused by legacy boards like this.  So, this conversion
should be safe.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

diff --git a/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c b/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
index 5deb2d8..6af7777 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
+++ b/arch/sh/boards/mach-kfr2r09/setup.c
@@ -375,8 +375,8 @@ static struct resource kfr2r09_sh_sdhi0_resources[] = {
 static struct tmio_mmc_data sh7724_sdhi0_data = {
        .chan_priv_tx   = (void *)SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_TX,
        .chan_priv_rx   = (void *)SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_RX,
-       .flags          = TMIO_MMC_WRPROTECT_DISABLE,
        .capabilities   = MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ,
+       .capabilities2  = MMC_CAP2_NO_WRITE_PROTECT,
 };
 
 static struct platform_device kfr2r09_sh_sdhi0_device = {