net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe

Make the LAN9303 work when lan9303_probe() is called twice.

For some unknown reason the LAN9303 switch fail to forward data when switch
fabric port 0 TX is disabled during probe. (Write of LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0
in lan9303_disable_processing_port().)

In that situation the switch fabric seem to receive frames, because the ALR
is learning addresses. But no frames are transmitted on any of the ports.

In our system lan9303_probe() is called twice, first time
dsa_register_switch() return -EPROBE_DEFER. As an experiment, modified the
code to skip writing LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0, port 0 during the first probe.
Then the switch works as expected.

Resolve the problem by not calling lan9303_disable_processing_port() on
port 0 during probe. Ports 1 and 2 are still disabled.

Although unsatisfying that the exact failure mechanism is not known,
the patch should not cause any harm.

Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
index 87f919f0e641321bcda69ebe7aa4448e4e63ac69..4c412bd52319d88e51a035cf7dd2689d4a035bd7 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int lan9303_disable_processing(struct lan9303 *chip)
 {
        int p;
 
-       for (p = 0; p < LAN9303_NUM_PORTS; p++) {
+       for (p = 1; p < LAN9303_NUM_PORTS; p++) {
                int ret = lan9303_disable_processing_port(chip, p);
 
                if (ret)