ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints

When code uses a pre-increment it makes the reader question "why".
In the constraint fetching code there is no reason for the variables
to be pre-incremented so adjust to post-increment.
No intended functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index ce62e61..7711dde 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints_amd(void)
                        acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle,
                                          "LPI: constraints list begin:\n");
 
-                       for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
+                       for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
                                union acpi_object *info_obj = &package->package.elements[j];
                                struct lpi_device_constraint_amd dev_info = {};
                                struct lpi_constraints *list;
                                acpi_status status;
 
-                               for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; ++k) {
+                               for (k = 0; k < info_obj->package.count; k++) {
                                        union acpi_object *obj = &info_obj->package.elements[k];
 
                                        list = &lpi_constraints_table[lpi_constraints_table_size];
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
                if (!package)
                        continue;
 
-               for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; ++j) {
+               for (j = 0; j < package->package.count; j++) {
                        union acpi_object *element =
                                        &(package->package.elements[j]);
 
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void lpi_device_get_constraints(void)
 
                constraint->min_dstate = -1;
 
-               for (j = 0; j < package_count; ++j) {
+               for (j = 0; j < package_count; j++) {
                        union acpi_object *info_obj = &info.package[j];
                        union acpi_object *cnstr_pkg;
                        union acpi_object *obj;