ASoC: topology: KUnit: Add KUnit tests passing topology with PCM to snd_soc_tplg_comp...
authorAmadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:28:46 +0000 (16:28 +0100)
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:26 +0000 (12:36 +0000)
In order to ensure correct behaviour of topology API, add unit tests
exercising topology functionality.

Add topology containing PCM template and tests for parsing it. Also
adds test cases simulating modules reloads in case of separate drivers
for card and component.

Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210120152846.1703655-6-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
sound/soc/soc-topology-test.c

index bae40c1..36e2a34 100644 (file)
@@ -138,6 +138,79 @@ static struct tplg_tmpl_001 tplg_tmpl_empty = {
        },
 };
 
+// Structural representation of topology containing SectionPCM
+
+struct tplg_tmpl_002 {
+       struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr header;
+       struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest manifest;
+       struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr pcm_header;
+       struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm pcm;
+} __packed;
+
+static struct tplg_tmpl_002 tplg_tmpl_with_pcm = {
+       .header = {
+               .magic = SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC,
+               .abi = 5,
+               .version = 0,
+               .type = SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST,
+               .size = sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr),
+               .vendor_type = 0,
+               .payload_size = sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest),
+               .index = 0,
+               .count = 1,
+       },
+       .manifest = {
+               .size = sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest),
+               .pcm_elems = 1,
+               /* rest of fields is 0 */
+       },
+       .pcm_header = {
+               .magic = SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC,
+               .abi = 5,
+               .version = 0,
+               .type = SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM,
+               .size = sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr),
+               .vendor_type = 0,
+               .payload_size = sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm),
+               .index = 0,
+               .count = 1,
+       },
+       .pcm = {
+               .size = sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm),
+               .pcm_name = "KUNIT Audio",
+               .dai_name = "kunit-audio-dai",
+               .pcm_id = 0,
+               .dai_id = 0,
+               .playback = 1,
+               .capture = 1,
+               .compress = 0,
+               .stream = {
+                       [0] = {
+                               .channels = 2,
+                       },
+                       [1] = {
+                               .channels = 2,
+                       },
+               },
+               .num_streams = 0,
+               .caps = {
+                       [0] = {
+                               .name = "kunit-audio-playback",
+                               .channels_min = 2,
+                               .channels_max = 2,
+                       },
+                       [1] = {
+                               .name = "kunit-audio-capture",
+                               .channels_min = 2,
+                               .channels_max = 2,
+                       },
+               },
+               .flag_mask = 0,
+               .flags = 0,
+               .priv = { 0 },
+       },
+};
+
 /* ===== TEST CASES ========================================================= */
 
 // TEST CASE
@@ -586,6 +659,161 @@ static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_payload_size(struct kunit *tes
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
 }
 
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing topology file with PCM definition
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+       u8 *data;
+       int size;
+       int ret;
+
+       /* prepare */
+       kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+       kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+       kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+       size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm);
+       data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+       memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_with_pcm, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm));
+
+       kunit_comp->fw.data = data;
+       kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+       kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+       kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+       kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+       kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+       kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+       kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+       /* run test */
+       ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+       if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+               KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+       ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+       ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+       snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+
+       /* cleanup */
+       ret = snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing topology file with PCM definition
+// with component reload
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_comp(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+       u8 *data;
+       int size;
+       int ret;
+       int i;
+
+       /* prepare */
+       kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+       kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+       kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+       size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm);
+       data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+       memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_with_pcm, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm));
+
+       kunit_comp->fw.data = data;
+       kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+       kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+       kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+       kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+       kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+       kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+       kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+       /* run test */
+       ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+       if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+               KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+               ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+               KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+               ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+               KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+               snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+       }
+
+       /* cleanup */
+       ret = snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing topology file with PCM definition
+// with card reload
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_card(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+       u8 *data;
+       int size;
+       int ret;
+       int i;
+
+       /* prepare */
+       kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+       kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+       kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+       size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm);
+       data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+       memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_with_pcm, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm));
+
+       kunit_comp->fw.data = data;
+       kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+       kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+       kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+       kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+       kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+       kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+       kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+       /* run test */
+       ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+       ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+               ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+               if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+                       KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+               ret = snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+               KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+       }
+
+       /* cleanup */
+       snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
 /* ===== KUNIT MODULE DEFINITIONS =========================================== */
 
 static struct kunit_case snd_soc_tplg_test_cases[] = {
@@ -597,6 +825,9 @@ static struct kunit_case snd_soc_tplg_test_cases[] = {
        KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_abi),
        KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_size),
        KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_payload_size),
+       KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg),
+       KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_comp),
+       KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_card),
        {}
 };