The timestamps and size of a lower inode involved in a link() call was
being copied to the upper parent inode. Instead, we should be
copying lower parent inode's timestamps and size to the upper parent
inode. I discovered this bug using the POSIX test suite at Tuxera.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
rc = ecryptfs_interpose(lower_new_dentry, new_dentry, dir->i_sb, 0);
if (rc)
goto out_lock;
- fsstack_copy_attr_times(dir, lower_new_dentry->d_inode);
- fsstack_copy_inode_size(dir, lower_new_dentry->d_inode);
+ fsstack_copy_attr_times(dir, lower_dir_dentry->d_inode);
+ fsstack_copy_inode_size(dir, lower_dir_dentry->d_inode);
old_dentry->d_inode->i_nlink =
ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(old_dentry->d_inode)->i_nlink;
i_size_write(new_dentry->d_inode, file_size_save);