[SelectionDAG] Use correct boolean representation in FoldConstantArithmetic

The description of SETCC says
  /// SetCC operator - This evaluates to a true value iff the condition is
  /// true.  If the result value type is not i1 then the high bits conform
  /// to getBooleanContents.

Without this patch, we sign extended the i1 to the used larger type
regardless of getBooleanContents. This resulted in miscompiles, as
shown in the attached testcase that ended up returning -1 instead of
1 when using -mattr=+v.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55168

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124618

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
index 69e100c..d667988 100644 (file)
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
@@ -5580,9 +5580,14 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic(unsigned Opcode, const SDLoc &DL,
       !llvm::all_of(Ops, IsScalarOrSameVectorSize))
     return SDValue();
 
-  // If we are comparing vectors, then the result needs to be a i1 boolean
-  // that is then sign-extended back to the legal result type.
+  // If we are comparing vectors, then the result needs to be a i1 boolean that
+  // is then extended back to the legal result type depending on how booleans
+  // are represented.
   EVT SVT = (Opcode == ISD::SETCC ? MVT::i1 : VT.getScalarType());
+  ISD::NodeType ExtendCode =
+      (Opcode == ISD::SETCC && SVT != VT.getScalarType())
+          ? TargetLowering::getExtendForContent(TLI->getBooleanContents(VT))
+          : ISD::SIGN_EXTEND;
 
   // Find legal integer scalar type for constant promotion and
   // ensure that its scalar size is at least as large as source.
@@ -5640,7 +5645,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic(unsigned Opcode, const SDLoc &DL,
 
     // Legalize the (integer) scalar constant if necessary.
     if (LegalSVT != SVT)
-      ScalarResult = getNode(ISD::SIGN_EXTEND, DL, LegalSVT, ScalarResult);
+      ScalarResult = getNode(ExtendCode, DL, LegalSVT, ScalarResult);
 
     // Scalar folding only succeeded if the result is a constant or UNDEF.
     if (!ScalarResult.isUndef() && ScalarResult.getOpcode() != ISD::Constant &&

diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/fold-vector-cmp.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/fold-vector-cmp.ll
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..cfe64ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/fold-vector-cmp.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
+; RUN: llc -start-after codegenprepare -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=-v -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -start-after codegenprepare -mtriple=riscv64 -mattr=+v -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Reproducer for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55168.
+; We should always return 1 (and not -1).
+define i32 @test(i32 %call.i) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    li a0, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
+  %t2 = insertelement <2 x i32> <i32 poison, i32 -2147483648>, i32 %call.i, i64 0
+  %t3 = icmp slt <2 x i32> %t2, <i32 -2147483646, i32 -2147483646>
+  %t4 = zext <2 x i1> %t3 to <2 x i32>
+  %t6 = extractelement <2 x i32> %t4, i64 1
+  ret i32 %t6
+}