This driver relies on IEEE80211_CONF_PS of hw->conf.flags to turn off PS or
turn on dynamic PS controlled by driver and firmware. Though this would be
incorrect, it did work before because the flag is always recalculated until
the commit
28977e790b5d ("wifi: mac80211: skip powersave recalc if driver SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_PS")
is introduced by kernel 5.20 to skip to recalculate IEEE80211_CONF_PS
of hw->conf.flags if driver sets SUPPORTS_DYNAMIC_PS.
Correct this by doing recalculation while BSS_CHANGED_PS is changed and
interface is added or removed. It is allowed to enter PS only if single
one station vif is working. Without this fix, driver doesn't enter PS
anymore that causes higher power consumption.
Fixes:
bcde60e599fb ("rtw88: remove misleading module parameter rtw_fw_support_lps")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230527082939.11206-2-pkshih@realtek.com
}
}
- if (changed & IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_PS) {
- if (hw->conf.flags & IEEE80211_CONF_PS) {
- rtwdev->ps_enabled = true;
- } else {
- rtwdev->ps_enabled = false;
- rtw_leave_lps(rtwdev);
- }
- }
-
if (changed & IEEE80211_CONF_CHANGE_CHANNEL)
rtw_set_channel(rtwdev);
config |= PORT_SET_BCN_CTRL;
rtw_vif_port_config(rtwdev, rtwvif, config);
rtw_core_port_switch(rtwdev, vif);
+ rtw_recalc_lps(rtwdev, vif);
mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
config |= PORT_SET_BCN_CTRL;
rtw_vif_port_config(rtwdev, rtwvif, config);
clear_bit(rtwvif->port, rtwdev->hw_port);
+ rtw_recalc_lps(rtwdev, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
}
if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_ERP_SLOT)
rtw_conf_tx(rtwdev, rtwvif);
+ if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_PS)
+ rtw_recalc_lps(rtwdev, NULL);
+
rtw_vif_port_config(rtwdev, rtwvif, config);
mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
* more than two stations associated to the AP, then we can not enter
* lps, because fw does not handle the overlapped beacon interval
*
- * mac80211 should iterate vifs and determine if driver can enter
- * ps by passing IEEE80211_CONF_PS to us, all we need to do is to
+ * rtw_recalc_lps() iterate vifs and determine if driver can enter
+ * ps by vif->type and vif->cfg.ps, all we need to do here is to
* get that vif and check if device is having traffic more than the
* threshold.
*/
__rtw_leave_lps_deep(rtwdev);
}
+
+struct rtw_vif_recalc_lps_iter_data {
+ struct rtw_dev *rtwdev;
+ struct ieee80211_vif *found_vif;
+ int count;
+};
+
+static void __rtw_vif_recalc_lps(struct rtw_vif_recalc_lps_iter_data *data,
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
+{
+ if (data->count < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (vif->type != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
+ data->count = -1;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ data->count++;
+ data->found_vif = vif;
+}
+
+static void rtw_vif_recalc_lps_iter(void *data, u8 *mac,
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
+{
+ __rtw_vif_recalc_lps(data, vif);
+}
+
+void rtw_recalc_lps(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *new_vif)
+{
+ struct rtw_vif_recalc_lps_iter_data data = { .rtwdev = rtwdev };
+
+ if (new_vif)
+ __rtw_vif_recalc_lps(&data, new_vif);
+ rtw_iterate_vifs(rtwdev, rtw_vif_recalc_lps_iter, &data);
+
+ if (data.count == 1 && data.found_vif->cfg.ps) {
+ rtwdev->ps_enabled = true;
+ } else {
+ rtwdev->ps_enabled = false;
+ rtw_leave_lps(rtwdev);
+ }
+}
void rtw_leave_lps(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev);
void rtw_leave_lps_deep(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev);
enum rtw_lps_deep_mode rtw_get_lps_deep_mode(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev);
+void rtw_recalc_lps(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *new_vif);
+
#endif