clk: imx: pll14xx: align pdiv with reference manual

The PLL14xx hardware can be found on i.MX8M{M,N,P} SoCs and always come
with a 6-bit pre-divider. Neither the reference manuals nor the
datasheets of these SoCs do mention any restrictions. Furthermore the
current code doesn't respect the restrictions from the comment too.

Therefore drop the restriction and align the max pre-divider (pdiv)
value to 63 to get more accurate frequencies.

Fixes: b09c68dc57c9 ("clk: imx: pll14xx: Support dynamic rates")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Tested-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807084744.1184791-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
index 7150c59..dc6bc21 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-pll14xx.c
@@ -139,11 +139,10 @@ static void imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rat
        /*
         * Fractional PLL constrains:
         *
-        * a) 6MHz <= prate <= 25MHz
-        * b) 1 <= p <= 63 (1 <= p <= 4 prate = 24MHz)
-        * c) 64 <= m <= 1023
-        * d) 0 <= s <= 6
-        * e) -32768 <= k <= 32767
+        * a) 1 <= p <= 63
+        * b) 64 <= m <= 1023
+        * c) 0 <= s <= 6
+        * d) -32768 <= k <= 32767
         *
         * fvco = (m * 65536 + k) * prate / (p * 65536)
         */
@@ -186,7 +185,7 @@ static void imx_pll14xx_calc_settings(struct clk_pll14xx *pll, unsigned long rat
        }
 
        /* Finally calculate best values */
-       for (pdiv = 1; pdiv <= 7; pdiv++) {
+       for (pdiv = 1; pdiv <= 63; pdiv++) {
                for (sdiv = 0; sdiv <= 6; sdiv++) {
                        /* calc mdiv = round(rate * pdiv * 2^sdiv) / prate) */
                        mdiv = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * (pdiv << sdiv), prate);